Expelled because of ADHD
It was therefore unjustified to dismiss her on the grounds that she had not fulfilled its obligation, and she was consequently entitled to compensation for wages and holiday pay during the notice period. Supreme Court ruled then that lawyer secretary suffered from ADHD to such an extent that she was covered by the concept of disability in discrimination law and the underlying EU directive.
The Judgment Shows
When she was expelled with regard to its ADHD disorder, there was direct discrimination by discrimination Act § 2. 1 pursuant to § 1 paragraph. 2 Lawyer Secretary was then awarded compensation on the basis of the guidelines that have evolved in practice by dismissal in breach of the Equal Treatment Law § 9, was set to 6 months' salary. verdict shows that ADHD may involve such impairment, the disorder is a disability discrimination in the legal sense. The judgment is thus a direct extension of the ECJ judgment of 11 April 2013 in which the Supreme Court also refers.
The judgment also shows that the level of compensation for discrimination law should be the same as the Equal Treatment Act, ie. 6 months at very short length, 9 months as a rule, and 12 months in particularly aggravating circumstances.