Tim’s practice focuses on all areas of federal income tax law, with emphasis on tax controversies and renewable energy. Tim served as an attorney-advisor to the Hon. Michael B. Thornton (2003-2005) and the Hon. Robert P. Ruwe (2001-2003) on the US Tax Court, and has particular knowledge in the areas of Tax Court practice, procedure, and litigation. Tim practices regularly in the Tax Court and the US Court of Federal Claims and also is admitted to practice in the US Supreme Court, and the US Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fourth, Sixth and Federal Circuits.

As a member of the Renewable Energy Tax Team, Tim is also involved in every aspect of achieving recognition of tax incentives from the legislative process, to the Treasury and IRS guidance phase, to the forward-planning phase, to representing industry leaders in the renewable space, and finally to defending tax incentives at both the administrative and court level. Tim is highly engaged in providing direct support to clients in navigating the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.

Bar Admissions

Education
LLM, Taxation, New York University, 2001

JD, Duquesne University, magna cum laude, 2000

BA, Washington & Jefferson College, cum laude, 1997

• Successfully tried foreign tax credit case in the US Tax Court involving the creditability of the UK Windfall Tax. In a unanimous 9-0 opinion, the US Supreme Court agreed with this holding based on the Tax Court record and opinion.
  • PPL Corp. & Subs. v. Comm’r, 135 T.C. 304 (2010). 
  • PPL Corp. & Subs. v. Comm’r, 665 F.3d 60 (3d Cir. 2011). 
  • PPL Corp. & Subs. v. Comm’r, 569 US ___ (May 20, 2013).
  • Press Release re Supreme Court Opinion.
• Successfully tried utility industry issue in the US Tax Court involving the depreciation period of street lights.  
  • PPL Corp. & Subs. v. Comm’r, 135 T.C. 176 (2010). 
  • Press Release re Tax Court Opinion.
  • Press Release re IRS Declines Appeal.
• Litigating cases in US Tax Court and handled IRS appeals involving alleged “intermediary” transactions covered by IRS Notice 2001-16 and Notice 2008-111.
• Successfully tried alleged four consolidated cases involving alleged intermediary transactions in US Tax Court.  Tax Court issued sweeping precedent opinion on correct application of transferee liability rules to such transactions.
  • Swords v. Comm’r, 142 T.C. No. 19 (May 29, 2014).
• Successfully litigated a high-profile, national issue involving the validity of a regulatory statute of limitations under the Chevron deference standards and an issue of first impression involving the application of the tolling rules under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. Argued case before Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
  • Jones v. Commissioner, Tax Ct. No. 08-17359 (summary judgment).
  • Jones v. Commissioner, 642 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2011) (precedent opinion).
  • IRS Notice 2011-70 (full concession).
  • Press Release re IRS Concession.
• Represent and advise taxpayers in controversies involving the Treasury’s Section 1603 grant program.  Litigating Section 1603 cases in the US Court of Federal Claims. 
  • RP1 Fuel Cell LLC, et al. v. United States, Case No. 13-552C (trial before Judge Marian Blank Horn scheduled beginning July 14, 2014).
• Represent and advise taxpayers with respect to IRS challenges to partnerships with federal and state tax credits. Commentator on the leading federal tax credit partnership case in Historic Boardwalk Hall, LLC v. Commissioner, 694 F.3d 425 (3d Cir. 2012).
  • A. Elliott, “IRS Provides Rehab Tax Credit Safe Harbor Following Historic Boardwalk,” 2014 TNT 1-2 (Jan. 2, 2014).
  • S. Trivedi, “Practitioners Balk at IRS Memo on Rehabilitation Credits,” 138 Tax Notes 1050 (Mar. 4, 2013).
  • S. Trivedi, “No Surprises, Just Disappointment with IRS Memo on Rehabilitation Credits,” Tax Notes Today, 2013 TNT 41-2 (Mar. 1, 2013).
  • S. Trivedi, “Third Circuit Reverses Tax Court in Historic Boardwalk Hall,” Tax Notes Today, 2012 TNT 167-1 (Aug. 28, 2012).
• Litigating and litigated cases in US Tax Court involving Virginia conservation easements, including valuation issues, partnership issues, and the application of the disguised sale rules to state tax credit transactions.
  • Route 231, LLC v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2014-30 (Feb. 24, 2014).
  • SWF Real Estate LLC v. Commissioner, Tax Ct. No. 11190-11 (tried Feb. 6-8, 2013).
  • Fairborn Wright, LLC v. Commissioner, Tax Ct. No. 18098-10 (settled).
  • Carlyle Commonwealth Fund, LLC v. Commissioner, Tax Ct. No. 18097-10 (settled).
  • Rulings of the Virginia Tax Commissioner, Public Document Number 13-225 (Dec. 17, 2013) (ruling that federal disguised sale determination with respect to land preservation tax credit partnership does not result in income or gain for Virginia tax purposes).
• Filed amici brief in US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in support of taxpayer in leading state tax credit partnership case.
  • Virginia Historic Tax Credit Fund 2001 LP v. Commissioner, 4th Cir. Nos. 10-1333, 10-1334, and 10-1336.
• Fully briefed and submitted in the US Tax Court a high-profile corporate tax issue involving the rescission of a corporate dividend. Issue resolved favorably to taxpayer without decision as a result of prevailing on related issue in case.
  • PPL Corp. & Sub s. v. Commissioner, Tax Ct. No. 25393-07.
• Successfully represented company in obtaining pre-filing agreement from IRS permitting deduction of a substantial portion of the company's settlement of one of the largest judgments under the Federal False Claims Act.
  • The IRS Pre-Filing Agreement Program and Deducting Government Settlements, Financial Fraud Law Report, February 2010.
• Successfully represented a publicly-traded alternative energy company before the IRS National Office as part of its technical advice process with respect to a substantial disallowance of tax credits and application of penalties. The issue involved
  • Tech. Adv. Memo. 201113025 (Apr. 1, 2011).  
• Successfully represented major public entity in connection with one of the largest rail transportation projects in the United States, obtaining a private letter ruling that relocation of utility lines and payments to an electric utility were excludable from income.
  • Priv. Ltr. Rul. 200952014 (Dec. 24, 2009). 
• Successfully represented a publicly-traded corporation before the IRS with respect to a large worthless stock deduction claimed by the corporation. After the IRS proposed to disallow the deduction in full, the IRS National Office conceded the case based on the arguments presented by the tax controversy team.
• Represents clients in tax litigation in US Tax Court, federal district courts, US Court of Federal Claims, US Courts of Appeals, and the US Supreme Court.
• Represents corporate, partnership, and individual clients in IRS administrative and Appeals Office proceedings.
• Represents clients in obtaining private letter rulings, pre-filing agreements, and technical advice memoranda.

Other Publications:

• “Does Your Choice of Tax Adviser Increase Your Chances of Audit?,” 135 Tax Notes 909 (May 14, 2012)

• Barrister, J. Edgar Murdock Inn of Court, US Tax Court
• American Bar Association, Tax Section
• District of Columbia Bar Association, Tax Section
• Board of Directors, The Community Tax Law Project, Richmond, Virginia

• The Community Tax Law Project Pro Bono Volunteer of the Year, 2007

• President Biden’s Proposal to Enhance Financial Account Information Reporting Regime on Form 1099

  By Timothy Jacobs |July 2021

• Update on Section 1603 Litigation in the US Court of Federal Claims, Pratt’s Energy Law Report
• Affordable Care Act and the IRS: Implementation and Now Enforcement, Virginia Lawyer
• Does Your Choice of Tax Adviser Increase Your Chances of Audit?, Tax Analysts
• A Dark Future for Historic Tax Credits After Historic Boardwalk, Taxation of Exempts
• The IRS Pre-Filing Agreement Program and Deducting Government Settlements, Financial Fraud Law Report
• Barnes Group: Tax Court Turns a Blind Eye to Rauenhorst, Tax Analysts
• Does Your Choice of Tax Adviser Increase Your Chances of Audit?, Tax Analysts
• Recent Developments in Section 1603 Grant Litigation, Pratt’s Government Contracting Law Report
• Another Sad Chapter in the Service’s Assault on Façade Easements, Taxation of Exempts – Kaufman
• Securing Summary Judgment in Section 1603 Suits Got Harder, Law360
• IRS Guidance for Flip Structures in Wind Deals, Energy Law360
• Finally - More Renewable Energy Tax Credit Provisions, Energy Law360
• Internal Revenue Service Issues Clarification and Modification of Beginning of Construction Rules for Purposes of the Production Tax Credit (And Investment Tax Credit in Lieu of Production Tax Credit), Pratt’s Energy Law Report