log in
All Articles | Back

Member Articles


NLRB Returns to Historic Standard for Arbitral Deference 

by Jacqueline N. Rau

Published: January, 2020

Submission: January, 2020

 



On Dec. 23, 2019, in a unanimous decision in United Parcel Service, Inc.1, the National Labor Relations Board returned to its historic standards for arbitral deference.2 The decision expressly overrules the Board’s 2014 decision in Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co., Inc.3


Under the restored standard, the Board will defer to an arbitrator’s decision where:


  1. The arbitral proceedings appear to have been fair and regular;
  2. All parties have agreed to be bound;
  3. The arbitrator considered the unfair labor practice issue; and
  4. The arbitrator’s decision is not clearly repugnant to the National Labor Relations Act.

The restored standard is more deferential to parties’ arbitral agreements and decisions. The burden of proof will rest with the party opposing deferral to show the above standards were not met. With this decision, the Board applied its historic standard retroactively to all pending cases before the Board.


In making its decision, the Board noted its Babcock & Wilcox decision was premised on two flawed concepts:


  1. There was excessive risk arbitrators would not adequately consider statutory issues implicated in discharge and discipline cases; and
  2. Private dispute resolution should remain a remedy separate and independent from statutory remedies.


The Board cautioned this flawed view was inconsistent with the Federal Arbitration Act and judicial precedent. In addition to the flawed reasoning, the Board noted there were serious concerns with the Babcock & Wilcox standard, including that it risks the Board improperly interfering with the parties’ contract rights, it encourages re-litigation of claims involving discharge or disciplinary actions, and it improperly places the burden of proof on the party in favor of arbitral deference. The Board concluded that returning to its historic standard best serves the national policymaking initiative in the Act.


For specific questions about this opinion, coverage under the National Labor Relations Act, or labor-related claims in general, please contact your Dinsmore attorney.


 


[1] United Parcel Service, Inc., 369 NLRB No. 1 (2019). 


[2] The Board’s standards for post-arbitral deferral were outlined in Olin Corp., 268 NLRB 573 (1984), and Spielberg Mfg. Corp., 112 NLRB 1080 (1955). The National Labor Relations Board’s standards for pre-arbitral deference were established in United Technologies Corp., 268 NLRB 557 (1984), and Alpha Beta Co., 273 NLRB 1546 (1985) (pre-arbitral settlement agreements).


[3] Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co., Inc. 361 NLRB 1127 (2014), rev. denied sub. nom. Beneli v. NLRB, 873 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 2017).


 



Link to article

 

MEMBER COMMENTS

 

 

WSG Member: Please login to add your comment.

    Disclaimer

WSG's members are independent firms and are not affiliated in the joint practice of professional services. Each member exercises its own individual judgments on all client matters.

HOME | SITE MAP | GLANCE | PRIVACY POLICY | DISCLAIMER |  © World Services Group, 2020