log in
All Articles | Back

Member Articles


SEC Enforcement Action – VALIC Financial Advisors 

by Kevin S. Woodard

Published: October, 2020

Submission: October, 2020

 



On July 28, 2020, the SEC announced a pair of settled administrative actions against Houston-based VALIC Financial Advisors (VFA).


In the first action, the SEC charged VFA with failing to disclose that its parent company paid a for-profit entity owned by a Florida teacher’s union to promote VFA to Florida teachers. The second action involved VFA’s wrap fee arrangements with clients.


In regards to the second action wrap fee arrangements, VFA instructed a third-party adviser to select from mutual funds in the no-transaction fee program offered by VFA’s clearing firm. The selection of no-transaction fee funds provided various financial benefits to VFA. First, VFA’s agreement with the clearing firm provided VFA with a portion of the revenue the clearing firm received from the mutual fund sponsor and any 12b-1 fees paid on client mutual fund assets. There were many 12b-1 fee-paying mutual fund share classes in the no-transaction fee program. In most instances, the mutual funds the third-party adviser selected had a lower-cost share class available that did not pay 12b-1 fees or that would not have led to revenue sharing to VFA. Second, by instructing the third-party adviser to limit new funds to those in the no-transaction fee program, VFA avoided paying execution costs for the clients’ purchases or sales of the mutual funds in the no-transaction fee program. VFA did not disclose that it had provided this instruction to the third-party adviser or the conflicts of interest arising from this instruction.


VFA’s activities as detailed in each action generally constituted violations of the anti-fraud provision of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, specifically Section 206. In settlement of the first action, VFA agreed to a cap on its management fee for the advisory product made available to Florida teachers, as well as a $20,000,000 civil monetary penalty. In the second action, VFA had already rebated approximately $2.3 million in 12b-1 fees plus interest to affected clients. In addition, VFA was subject to disgorgement and prejudgment interest, and a civil monetary penalty in a total amount of $19,943,753.


 



Link to article

 

MEMBER COMMENTS

 

 

WSG Member: Please login to add your comment.

    Disclaimer

WSG's members are independent firms and are not affiliated in the joint practice of professional services. Each member exercises its own individual judgments on all client matters.

HOME | SITE MAP | GLANCE | PRIVACY POLICY | DISCLAIMER |  © World Services Group, 2020