Firm: All
Practice Industry: Crossborder Trade & Investment, Dispute Resolution
Region: All
Country/ State: All
Tag: All
Wardynski & Partners | November 2006

Within the European Union the issue of taking evidence in another member state has been regulated uniformly by the Council regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters. However some general rules relating to the procedure of taking evidence abroad were developed and established long before the adoption of the regulation ...

Haynes and Boone, LLP | November 2006

Section 15(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) provides that “it shall be unlawful for any broker or dealer which is . . . a person other than a natural person . . . to make use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to effect any transactions in, or to induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of, any security… unless such broker or dealer is registered [with the SEC] ...

Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | October 2006

A spectacular smash-up always draws a crowd. In the outsourcing world, where the wreckage is nearly always kept under wraps, that’s even more true. When a problem deal does break into view, it’s always worth watching for lessons in how to manage – or how not to manage – these complex transactions ...

Lawson Lundell LLP | October 2006

The cause of an action in defamation exists to provide some recourse and remedy to victims of falsehoods which can and do cause injury to reputation. In a classic formulation, recently adopted and approved by Geopel J ...

Deacons | September 2006

Before 1978, China's economic policies were mainly aimed at self-reliance. As a result, the country was virtually shut off from world economic developments. In 1978, China opened its doors to foreign investment with the goal of modernising its economy and raising the living standard of its people. The country has since established the necessary legislative basis for foreign investment and has actively sought to acquire modern foreign management and technical skills ...

Deacons | July 2006

On 14 July 2006, the Hong Kong and Mainland China Governments signed a ground-breaking agreement, rather lengthily entitled "An Arrangement on Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters by the Courts of the Mainland and of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region pursuant to Choice of Court Agreements between Parties Concerned" (Arrangement), under which they agreed to recognise and enforce judgments made in each others courts ...

Deacons | July 2006

WHAT IS CEPA? The Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (“CEPA”) is a free trade agreement between Mainland China and Hong Kong that offers Hong Kong products, companies and residents preferential access to the Mainland market. Many of the preferences go beyond China’s WTO concessions. CEPA is not a closed agreement and both sides hold regular meetings on further concessions and the details for implementation ...

Shoosmiths LLP | July 2006

Although the United Kingdom comprises England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, this guide relates only to the current position in England and Wales because Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own individual legal systems. The rules and procedure of the Civil Courts in England and Wales are contained in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) which were introduced in 1999 and which lay down the framework within which all civil litigation must be conducted ...

Deacons | June 2006

China has traditionally restricted foreign investment in the retail and wholesale sectors with the aim of nurturing strong domestic players before their foreign counterparts would be allowed into the country. Since becoming a member of the World Trade Organisation, China has gradually opened up its distribution sector to foreign investment ...

Deacons | June 2006

The Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”), the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Taxation, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange jointly promulgated the Measures for the Administration of Strategic Investment of Foreign Investors in Listed Companies on 31 December 2005 ...

Deacons | June 2006

The Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) issued the Notice of the Ministry of Commerce on Entrusting Local Authorities with the Examination and Approval of Commercial Enterprises with Foreign Investment on 9 December 2005. The Notice, which became effective on 3 March 2006, is expected to reduce the time required for setting up a commercial enterprise with foreign investment (“commercial FIE”) ...

Deacons | June 2006

The Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) issued the following notices on 20 January 2006: the Notice on Entrusting the Provincial Level Authorities in Charge of Commerce with the Examination and Approval, and Administration of Non-Vessel Carrier Enterprises with Foreign Investment, the Notice on Entrusting the Provincial Level Authorities in Charge of Commerce with the Examination and Approval, and Administration of Road Transportation Enterprises with Foreign Investment, the Notice on Entrusting the

Deacons | June 2006

The State Administration for Industry and Commerce, the Ministry of Commerce, the General Administration of Customs and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange jointly issued the Implementing Opinion on Several Issues in the Laws Applicable to the Examination and Approval, Registration and Administration of Foreign Investment Enterprises on 24 April 2006 ...

Deacons | June 2006

The State Council issued the Regulations of the People's Republic of China for the Administration of the Registration of Companies on 18 December 2005. The Regulations have replaced 1994 regulations of the same name with effect from 1 January 2006. The revisions to the Regulations bring the rules for company registration in line with the amended Company Law of the People’s Republic of China (“Company Law”) (as discussed in issue 2005.3 of China Legal Update) ...

Deacons | June 2006

The Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) promulgated the Provisional Measures for the Administration of Processing Trade in Export Processing Zones on 22 November 2005. The Measures replace regulations of the same name with effect from 1 January 2006. Definitions The Provisional Measures define an export processing zone (“Zone”) as a specified area subject to closed supervision by the Customs ...

Deacons | June 2006

The Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) promulgated the Measures for the Administration of International Freight Forwarding Enterprises with Foreign Investment on 19 October 2005. The Measures, which entered into force on 11 December 2005, repeal regulations of the same name and their supplementary regulations issued in 2003 ...

Deacons | June 2006

The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE”) issued the Notice on Issues Relating to the Improvement of the Administration of Foreign Debt on 21 October 2005. The Notice entered into effect on 1 December 2005 and governs various aspects of the PRC regime for the control of foreign debt ...

Deacons | June 2006

The Supreme People’s Court promulgated the Regulations of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues in the Hearing of Cases Involving Disputes over Letters of Credit on 14 November 2005. The Regulations entered into effect on 1 January 2006 and provide clearer guidance not only on how PRC courts should deal with cases involving disputes over letters of credit (“LC disputes”) but also on the general operation of letters of credit (“LCs”) in China ...

Deacons | June 2006

The General Administration of Customs (“GAC”) issued the Measures of the Customs of the People’s Republic of China on Duty free Shops and Duty Free Goods on 28 November 2005. The Notice, which became effective on 1 January 2006, governs the establishment of duty free shops and the import and sale of duty free goods ...

Deacons | June 2006

The Ministry of Information Industries (“MII”) promulgated the Measures for the Administration of Internet Email Services on 20 February 2006. The Measures entered into effect on 30 March 2006 and are the first regulations in the PRC governing internet email services ...

Deacons | June 2006

The Guangdong Provincial Development and Reform Commission (“GDRC”) promulgated the Provisional Measures for the Administration of the Verification of Foreign Investment Projects on 18 February 2006. The Provisional Measures are the local implementing rules for the Provisional Measures for the Administration of the Verification of Foreign Investment Projects promulgated by the State Development and Reform Commission (“SDRC”) on 9 October 2004 (“SDRC Measures”) ...

Dykema | June 2006

Lessons in Using Employee Non-Compete Agreements An increasing number of companies are requiring their employees (new and existing) to sign so-called “non-compete” agreements. Many of these agreements prohibit employees from working for their employer’s competitors for a period of time after the termination of employment. Some are less restrictive—prohibiting former employees from performing certain duties or dealing with the former employer’s customers ...

Dykema | June 2006

This quarterly newsletter summarizes some of the recent administrative actions that will go into effect this year and which will impact funds and their advisers, beginning with the EDGAR requirements that mutual funds and separate account issuers designate new codes for each series and class when making their EDGAR filings ...

Dykema | June 2006

EDGAR Identifiers for Series and Classes Last July, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted amendments to Regulation S-T to require mutual funds and insurance company separate accounts issuing variable annuity contracts or variable life insurance products to obtain identifiers and electronically identify in their filings made through the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system to which of their series or classes the filing relates. See Rel. No ...

A&L Goodbody LLP | May 2006

There have been fresh developments in the continuing battle between pharmaceutical manufacturers and parallel importers. National and European courts have been attempting to strike a balance between the principle of the free movement of goods within the EU and the legitimate protection of intellectual property rights. The most recent contribution has come from Advocate General Sharpston (AG) in her opinion in the ongoing case of Boehringer and others v Swingward and Dowelhurst (C-348/04) ...

dots