The temporary telehealth flexibilities that Medicare patients and providers have become accustomed to since the COVID-19 pandemic are set to expire December 31, 2024. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 extended many pandemic era flexibilities...
Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Main Contacts
Offices
Overview
Since our establishment in Cincinnati, Ohio in 1908, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP has provided quality legal counsel to our clients enabling them to accomplish more. In recent years, our practice has grown into a national firm that services clients from coast-to-coast, as well as internationally. Today's full-service practice, with more than 750 attorneys, continues the standards established by our founding partners over a decade ago, which are efficient, cost-effective and comprehensive solutions for clients.
Our firm's commitment to quality service extends from our highly-skilled attorneys to our experienced professional staff. By establishing relationships based on trust, communication and responsiveness, we tailor our service to ensure our clients' current needs are met while also anticipating future ones.
Areas of Practice
Professionals
Partners
Mindy G. Barfield
PartnerJoshua W. Beam
PartnerAnthony F. Bonner
PartnerM. Evan Buckley
PartnerChristopher R. Cashen
PartnerThomas D. Flanigan
PartnerLauren L. Fletcher
PartnerLaura D’Angelo Holoubek
PartnerChristopher L. Jackson
PartnerKristeena L. Johnson
PartnerSara A. Johnston
PartnerDavid P. Kaiser
PartnerEllen Arvin Kennedy
PartnerWade C. Lawson
PartnerJ. Robert Lyons
PartnerGrahmn N. Morgan
PartnerTerri R. Stallard
PartnerMartin B. Tucker
PartnerLinsey W. West
PartnerAssociates
Erica A. Ashton
AssociateHouston A. Bragg
AssociateKyle R. Bunnell
AssociateK. Cassandra Carter
AssociateSeth T. Church
AssociateZachary E. Derbyshire
AssociateAlexander H. Gardner
AssociateSpencer K. Gray
AssociateBrandon E. Lira
AssociateJames "Mac" McClure
AssociateDonald C. Morgan
AssociateMadison C. Stewart
AssociateKenneth A. Trotter Jr.
AssociateOf Counsel
Glen S. Bagby
Of CounselJames E. Cleveland
Of CounselChauncey S.R. Curtz
Of CounselBarbara B. Edelman
Of CounselRobert W. Fleming
Of CounselLionel A. Hawse
Of CounselShaye P. Johnson
Of CounselLaura E. Maloney
Of CounselTyler Powell
Of CounselJohn R. Rhorer
Of CounselCourtney Ross Samford
Of CounselCharles E. Ward
Partner Of CounselOther
Autumn R. Clark
Law ClerkRiley J. Ward
Law ClerkArticles
Corporate Transparency Act Blocked Nationwide by Texas District Court
On December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”).[1] The CTA, and its Reporting Rule, were set to require approximately 32.6 million existing reporting companies to file beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reports with FinCEN by January 1, 2025. Pending further proceedings, or cases that can change this result, reporting companies are not required to comply with the CTA’s January 1, 2025 BOI reporting deadline. The government appealed that decision to the Fifth Circuit on December 5...
Press
Dinsmore Helps Secure Appellate Victory for Hyundai in Tragic Product Liability Case
The Kentucky Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed a defense verdict in favor of Hyundai Motor America and Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd. (“Hyundai”) in a product liability crashworthiness case involving deeply tragic circumstances. The case involved a high-speed, head-on collision in December 2015 that claimed the lives of three family members. The crash occurred when an impaired driver crossed the center line and collided with the family’s vehicle, a Hyundai Tucson. At trial in 2022, plaintiffs alleged that the Tucson contained a manufacturing defect that contributed to the fatalities...
Dinsmore Attorneys Help Secure Ohio Supreme Court Ruling in Opioid Case
Earlier this month, the Ohio Supreme Court, on the certification of a state-law question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, ruled that the Ohio Product Liability Law abrogates claims asserted against sellers of prescription opioids for costs related to opioid abuse treatment that are based upon a public nuisance theory. In the underlying Federal Court case a judgment (based upon the theory that a public nuisance claim is viable under the law of the State of Ohio) in the amount of $650 million had been entered against major pharmacy chains Walgreens, Walmart and CVS. That verdict was appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...