Jarrett Osborne-Revis is a Senior Counsel in Buchalter’s Sacramento office, and a member of the Firm’s Litigation Practice Group and Insolvency & Financial Group. He regularly represents business entities (including corporations, limited liability companies, limited partnerships, and unincorporated associations), financial institutions, private lenders, and individuals in commercial litigation matters and insolvency proceedings. He has defended actions involving commercial and residential real estate disputes, partnership disputes, financial services litigation, lender liability actions, manufacturing, equipment leasing, factored financing transactions, receivership law, post-judgment enforcement, and insolvency proceedings.

He has a decade of experience representing business entities, financial institutions, private lenders, lessors, and unsecured creditors in chapter 7, 11, and 13 bankruptcy proceedings, reorganizations and out-of-court restructurings. His experience includes handling complex claim disputes, stay relief proceedings, nondischargeability actions, adversary proceedings involving disputed security interests, fraudulent transfer and preference actions, assumption and assignment of leases and executory contract, 363 asset sales, cash collateral disputes and confirmation of chapter 11 and 13 plans.

He was selected as a Northern California Super Lawyers” Rising Star” from 2019-2023. Most recently, he was recognized as Sacramento Magazine’s 2023 Top Lawyer in the field of Banking & Financial Service, and Bankruptcy and Creditor/Debtor.

Bar Admissions

• California

Education

• Santa Clara University School of Law
• Monmouth University

Significant Accomplishments
<p><strong>Banking and Financial Services Litigation</strong></p><ul><li><em>Narvasa v. U.S. Bancorp, </em>713 F. App’x 728 (9th Cir. 2018). Represented national banking association; successfully obtained affirmation of trial court’s dismissal of case based upon failure to allege a violation of California Civil Code section 2923.6(f)(3).</li><li><em>JTS Cmtys., Inc. v. ZB, N.A.</em>, No. 34-2017-00213368. Defended national banking association in litigation involving aiding and abetting claims that triggered Divisions 3 and 4 of the Commercial Code, the Bank Secrecy Act, and California Financial Code.</li><li><em>Evans v. ZB, N.A.,</em> 2:17-1123 WBS DD, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209632 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2017). Defended national banking association in successfully dismissing a class action brought by investors of bankrupt entity based upon claims that the national banking association knowingly provided substantial assistance to, and aided and abetted, the bankruptcy entity in engaging in a Ponzi scheme.</li><li><em>Stinson v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC,</em> 2:16-cv-01903-MCE-GGH, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152892 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2016). Successfully defended loan servicer in claims for violation of the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1691, negligence, and violation of California Civil Code sections 2923.7, 2924.10, and 2924.12.*</li><li><em>Narvasa v. U.S. Bancorp</em>, No. 2:15-cv-02369-KJM-EFB, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98991 (E.D. Cal. July 28, 2016). Represented national banking association to obtain ruling that the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 24, and its corresponding regulations, 12 C.F.R. § 34.4(a)(9) preempted California Civil Code sections 2923.6(f)(3) and 2923.7(b).*</li></ul><p><strong>Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation</strong></p><ul><li><em>JTS Cmtys., Inc. v. ZB, N.A. (In re Int’l Mfg. Grp., Inc.),</em> 574 B.R. 717 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2017). Represented national banking association in bankruptcy adversary proceeding in which the bankruptcy court remanded the adversary proceeding to state court on the grounds that the bankruptcy court lacked subject matter “related to” jurisdiction.</li></ul><p><strong>Business and Commercial Litigation</strong></p><ul><li><em>Fitness International, LLC v. Cole LA Riverside CA, LP</em>, Case No. G062740 (2023) Force majeure provision and doctrine of frustration of purpose in commercial lease for fitness center space did not excuse the tenant’s obligation to pay rent during COVID-19 pandemic.</li><li><em>Telecom Asset Mgmt., LLC v. Fiberlight, LLC</em>, No. 14-cv-00728-SI, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29919 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2017) and 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171642 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2016). Represented designer and engineer of fiber optic networks in post-judgment proceedings relating to an assignment order against judgment debtor.</li></ul><p>* <em>Represents experience from a previous law firm.</em></p>

• Calif. Ruling May Open Bankruptcy Trustees To Tort Liability
• Bankruptcy Trustees and Receivers Beware: The California Second District Court of Appeal Tests The Barton Doctrine’s Limits on Claims Against a Court-Appointed Officer Over a Distressed Commercial Real Estate Entity
• How Mortgage Duty Of Care Opinion May Affect Calif. Tort Law
• Sheen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.: The California Supreme Court Delivers a Big Win for Lenders and Loan Servicers
• SB 1079 Is a Setback for both Lenders and Borrowers