Post a comment
Print articleThe "Preventing Essential Medical Device Shortages Act of 2020": COVID-19 Side Effect that Could Permanently Harm Medical Device Manufacturers
April, 2020 - Heather Heiskell Jones, James E. Simon
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic crisis—infecting more than 2.7 million people worldwide, with almost 870,000 cases in the United States alone as of the writing of this article—has thrown nearly every industry into chaos as the world struggles to adjust to the new reality of social distancing and self-quarantining. Shortages of personal protective equipment ("PPE") such as N95 masks, surgical masks, gloves, and gowns have become commonplace, as medical professionals struggle to ensure they have the equipment they need for the daily treatment of patients, and ordinary citizens scramble to obtain the protective equipment they feel is necessary to keep them protected. Heartbreaking stories abound of ventilator shortages forcing hospitals and governments to contemplate incredibly difficult decisions, such as choosing to withhold treatment from the elderly in favor of younger, stronger patients with a better chance of survival.
Faced with an infected population and a shortage of medical equipment, PPE, and other life-saving devices, some state governors even have invoked their emergency powers to authorize their police forces to confiscate medical resources from private citizens and businesses. Such drastic measures, once considered unthinkable outside of the wartime realm, are now necessary so hospitals can be re-supplied and re-equipped as COVID-19 patients continue to flow in. Amidst these unprecedented circumstances, many in the media and elsewhere have expressed their frustration and bewilderment as to how the United States could have been caught so unprepared and lacking in vital medical resources, devices, and equipment.
According to an FDA statement submitted by Stephen M. Hahn, M.D., Commissioner of Food and Drugs for the FDA, at the outset of the virus, the FDA acted proactively to monitor the medical drug and device supply chain between the United States and China, recognizing correctly the COVID-19 pandemic likely would affect the availability of critical medical resources, and may lead to potential disruptions in their supply. In furtherance of these efforts, beginning on January 24, 2020, the FDA contacted more than 180 pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, reminded them of their legal obligations to “notify[] the FDA of any anticipated supply disruptions,” and asked them to “evaluate their entire supply chain” with China. These efforts were successful, as the FDA was able to promptly identify a coronavirus-caused drug shortage after the manufacturer reported the shortage as required.
In contrast, manufacturers of medical devices—which include N95 masks and ventilators, devices that are critically important in preventing transmission of the COVID-19 virus and in treating serious cases—are not legally required to report any anticipated shortages, actual shortages, or supply chain issues to the FDA. Thus, although the FDA was aware early of “63 manufacturers which represent 72 facilities in China that produce essential medical devices,” including several facilities “adversely affected by COVID-19,” it could only request that these manufacturers report shortage issues to the FDA, without being able to enforce this request. As Dr. Hahn explained, [N]o law exists requiring medical device manufacturers to notify the FDA when they become aware of a circumstance, including discontinuation of a product, that could lead to a potential shortage, and manufacturers are not required to respond when the FDA requests information about potential supply chain disruption.
As noted in its March 28, 2020 Update, the FDA is taking measures to adapt and to encourage medical device manufacturers to report anticipated shortages promptly, but remains legally limited to requesting that manufacturers participate in reporting voluntarily.
The FDA’s Proposed Regulations of Medical Device Manufacturers
In large part due to this situation, the FDA has taken affirmative steps to increase its regulatory authority over the entire medical device industry, using the COVID-19 pandemic as justification. As detailed in the FDA’s FY 2020 Budget Request, the agency is pursuing a detailed legislative proposal that would have long-lasting effects on medical device manufacturers nationwide. Noting that “[n]o law requires medical device manufacturers to notify the FDA when they become aware of a circumstance that could lead to a device shortage,” the FDA has requested that Congress authorize it to:
Additionally, the FDA requested that Congress “clarify FDA’s authority to require information that would improve FDA’s ability to assess critical infrastructure as well as manufacturing quality and capacity.” As Dr. Hahn noted, this proposal would “empower” the FDA to require detailed manufacturing and supply information from medical drug and device manufacturers to the extent necessary to improve the FDA’s “ability to recognize shortage signals.”
Congressional Response to the FDA’s Proposed Regulations
On March 12, 2020, within two weeks of Dr. Hahn’s statement, U.S. Senators Bob Casey (D-Pa.) and Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.) introduced Senate Bill 3468, titled as the Preventing Essential Medical Device Shortages Act of 2020 (“Medical Device Act”). The Medical Device Act directly addresses the FDA’s concerns, and, among other things, would take the following actions:
The Medical Device Act has since been referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, where it remains pending.
Potential Effects on Medical Device Manufacturers
Although the purpose of the Medical Device Act may be laudable, medical device manufacturers should be wary of the increased power and authority that would be granted to the FDA through its parent agency HHS, as such regulatory powers could have permanent, expensive side effects for the industry. For example, broad-based authority to impose reporting requirements on all essential medical device manufacturers would necessarily result in significant regulatory compliance burdens. The actual depth of these burdens would depend on the breadth of the information the FDA would seek, the detail requested, and the frequency of reporting requirements, but in any event would result in increased time and expense for all device manufacturers, to say nothing of the incidental scrutiny that the FDA would be allowed to apply.
Another negative effect would be the required assessment of the “essential device supply chain”—defined by the FDA as the critical infrastructure, manufacturing quality, and capacity of each manufacturer of essential medical devices—that would seemingly provide agency authority to interject regulatory objectives into every aspect of the manufacturing process. This is a result that no private entity desires.
Potential Response Opportunities
For these reasons, the medical device manufacturing industry would be well-advised to deter the FDA from achieving these goals, both by voluntarily cooperating in COVID-19 shortage reporting and by exercising its lobbying power against the Medical Device Act. As Dr. Hahn explained, the genesis of the FDA’s request for more regulatory authority arose out of its realization that the United States was facing multiple potential shortages of essential medical devices, and yet had no authority to compel medical device manufacturers to notify the government of any anticipated shortages. This, combined with the actual essential medical device shortages that did occur (most notably N95 masks and hospital ventilators, as regularly reported by news agencies) catalyzed the proposal of the Medical Device Act. However, as matters currently stand, the medical device industry possesses an opportunity to demonstrate to the FDA and Congress that additional regulations are unnecessary.
As detailed in the FDA’s March 28, 2020 update, the FDA has developed a voluntary device shortage reporting system that would allow manufacturers to update the FDA regarding any anticipated complications in their individual supply chains. While the FDA cannot enforce this reporting system (as yet), full and complete voluntary participation from all manufacturers would convincingly demonstrate the industry’s dedication to providing full assistance in emergency situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Thus, both for equitable reasons such as contributing to the effectiveness of the United States’ COVID-19 response, as well as economical and business purposes in continuing to operate without potentially oppressive regulation, all medical device manufacturers should be encouraged to fully cooperate with the FDA’s COVID-19 information requests in whatever way possible.
The medical device manufacturing industry also should assess the potential for applying lobbying efforts against the Medical Device Act. During these troubling times, the COVID-19 crisis is increasingly being used as justification for almost any level of government oversight, such as the Medical Device Act. Although many members of Congress might have initial, understandable reactions to offer blanket support to any act that might potentially save lives, a reasoned, logical discussion of the actual necessity of the bill might help temper the appetite for its enactment. In particular, if the industry cooperates with the FDA as recommended above, manufacturing lobbyists would have compelling arguments that it is unnecessary to add additional, onerous regulations to an industry that is already highly regulated, and is already cooperating with all FDA requests for information.
Conclusion
The COVID-19 crisis has presented all aspects of society with unprecedented challenges, and the medical device industry has not been immune. In its ever-evolving response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA has identified certain areas where it is concerned that medical device manufacturers are under-regulated. Certain members of Congress have become alarmed by these concerns and have responded by introducing a Senate bill with laudable goals that would nonetheless have potentially damaging side effects on all medical device manufacturers making products deemed “essential.” Industry members would be well-advised to assuage the FDA’s alarms by voluntarily cooperating with its reporting requests, and by employing lobbying efforts as appropriate to highlight the overreaching, unnecessary consequences of the Medical Device Act.
If you have any questions, please contact our COVID-19 Task Force.
Link to article
Faced with an infected population and a shortage of medical equipment, PPE, and other life-saving devices, some state governors even have invoked their emergency powers to authorize their police forces to confiscate medical resources from private citizens and businesses. Such drastic measures, once considered unthinkable outside of the wartime realm, are now necessary so hospitals can be re-supplied and re-equipped as COVID-19 patients continue to flow in. Amidst these unprecedented circumstances, many in the media and elsewhere have expressed their frustration and bewilderment as to how the United States could have been caught so unprepared and lacking in vital medical resources, devices, and equipment.
The FDA’s Frustration with Lack of Regulation of Medical Device Manufacturers
According to an FDA statement submitted by Stephen M. Hahn, M.D., Commissioner of Food and Drugs for the FDA, at the outset of the virus, the FDA acted proactively to monitor the medical drug and device supply chain between the United States and China, recognizing correctly the COVID-19 pandemic likely would affect the availability of critical medical resources, and may lead to potential disruptions in their supply. In furtherance of these efforts, beginning on January 24, 2020, the FDA contacted more than 180 pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, reminded them of their legal obligations to “notify[] the FDA of any anticipated supply disruptions,” and asked them to “evaluate their entire supply chain” with China. These efforts were successful, as the FDA was able to promptly identify a coronavirus-caused drug shortage after the manufacturer reported the shortage as required.
In contrast, manufacturers of medical devices—which include N95 masks and ventilators, devices that are critically important in preventing transmission of the COVID-19 virus and in treating serious cases—are not legally required to report any anticipated shortages, actual shortages, or supply chain issues to the FDA. Thus, although the FDA was aware early of “63 manufacturers which represent 72 facilities in China that produce essential medical devices,” including several facilities “adversely affected by COVID-19,” it could only request that these manufacturers report shortage issues to the FDA, without being able to enforce this request. As Dr. Hahn explained, [N]o law exists requiring medical device manufacturers to notify the FDA when they become aware of a circumstance, including discontinuation of a product, that could lead to a potential shortage, and manufacturers are not required to respond when the FDA requests information about potential supply chain disruption.
As noted in its March 28, 2020 Update, the FDA is taking measures to adapt and to encourage medical device manufacturers to report anticipated shortages promptly, but remains legally limited to requesting that manufacturers participate in reporting voluntarily.
The FDA’s Proposed Regulations of Medical Device Manufacturers
In large part due to this situation, the FDA has taken affirmative steps to increase its regulatory authority over the entire medical device industry, using the COVID-19 pandemic as justification. As detailed in the FDA’s FY 2020 Budget Request, the agency is pursuing a detailed legislative proposal that would have long-lasting effects on medical device manufacturers nationwide. Noting that “[n]o law requires medical device manufacturers to notify the FDA when they become aware of a circumstance that could lead to a device shortage,” the FDA has requested that Congress authorize it to:
- Require firms to notify the FDA of an anticipated significant interruption in the supply of an essential device;
- Require all manufacturers of devices determined to be essential to periodically provide the FDA with information about the manufacturing capacity of the essential device(s) they manufacture; and
- Authorize the temporary importation of devices whose risks presented when patients and healthcare providers lack access to critically important medical devices outweigh compliance with U.S. regulatory standards.
Additionally, the FDA requested that Congress “clarify FDA’s authority to require information that would improve FDA’s ability to assess critical infrastructure as well as manufacturing quality and capacity.” As Dr. Hahn noted, this proposal would “empower” the FDA to require detailed manufacturing and supply information from medical drug and device manufacturers to the extent necessary to improve the FDA’s “ability to recognize shortage signals.”
Congressional Response to the FDA’s Proposed Regulations
On March 12, 2020, within two weeks of Dr. Hahn’s statement, U.S. Senators Bob Casey (D-Pa.) and Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.) introduced Senate Bill 3468, titled as the Preventing Essential Medical Device Shortages Act of 2020 (“Medical Device Act”). The Medical Device Act directly addresses the FDA’s concerns, and, among other things, would take the following actions:
- Require the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to issue public regulations defining the term “essential device”;
- Add essential devices to the drug shortage list in the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act;
- Require essential device manufacturers to notify the Secretary about anticipated permanent discontinuance or interruption in an essential device manufacturing supply chain;
- Make information publicly available about disruptions in order to inform physicians, health providers and patient organizations about anticipated shortages;
- Allow the Secretary to exempt certain device shortages from public disclosure if it may lead to hoarding, price spikes and other issues that could adversely affect public health;
- Allow the Secretary to expedite the review of medical device applications to help mitigate anticipated shortages;
- Authorize the Secretary to expedite the inspection or re-inspection of establishments that could help mitigate or prevent shortages; and
- Require a Government Accountability Office report to examine the intra-agency coordination process that assesses risks associated with the essential device supply chain and identify ways to mitigate these risks.
The Medical Device Act has since been referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, where it remains pending.
Potential Effects on Medical Device Manufacturers
Although the purpose of the Medical Device Act may be laudable, medical device manufacturers should be wary of the increased power and authority that would be granted to the FDA through its parent agency HHS, as such regulatory powers could have permanent, expensive side effects for the industry. For example, broad-based authority to impose reporting requirements on all essential medical device manufacturers would necessarily result in significant regulatory compliance burdens. The actual depth of these burdens would depend on the breadth of the information the FDA would seek, the detail requested, and the frequency of reporting requirements, but in any event would result in increased time and expense for all device manufacturers, to say nothing of the incidental scrutiny that the FDA would be allowed to apply.
Another negative effect would be the required assessment of the “essential device supply chain”—defined by the FDA as the critical infrastructure, manufacturing quality, and capacity of each manufacturer of essential medical devices—that would seemingly provide agency authority to interject regulatory objectives into every aspect of the manufacturing process. This is a result that no private entity desires.
Potential Response Opportunities
For these reasons, the medical device manufacturing industry would be well-advised to deter the FDA from achieving these goals, both by voluntarily cooperating in COVID-19 shortage reporting and by exercising its lobbying power against the Medical Device Act. As Dr. Hahn explained, the genesis of the FDA’s request for more regulatory authority arose out of its realization that the United States was facing multiple potential shortages of essential medical devices, and yet had no authority to compel medical device manufacturers to notify the government of any anticipated shortages. This, combined with the actual essential medical device shortages that did occur (most notably N95 masks and hospital ventilators, as regularly reported by news agencies) catalyzed the proposal of the Medical Device Act. However, as matters currently stand, the medical device industry possesses an opportunity to demonstrate to the FDA and Congress that additional regulations are unnecessary.
As detailed in the FDA’s March 28, 2020 update, the FDA has developed a voluntary device shortage reporting system that would allow manufacturers to update the FDA regarding any anticipated complications in their individual supply chains. While the FDA cannot enforce this reporting system (as yet), full and complete voluntary participation from all manufacturers would convincingly demonstrate the industry’s dedication to providing full assistance in emergency situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Thus, both for equitable reasons such as contributing to the effectiveness of the United States’ COVID-19 response, as well as economical and business purposes in continuing to operate without potentially oppressive regulation, all medical device manufacturers should be encouraged to fully cooperate with the FDA’s COVID-19 information requests in whatever way possible.
The medical device manufacturing industry also should assess the potential for applying lobbying efforts against the Medical Device Act. During these troubling times, the COVID-19 crisis is increasingly being used as justification for almost any level of government oversight, such as the Medical Device Act. Although many members of Congress might have initial, understandable reactions to offer blanket support to any act that might potentially save lives, a reasoned, logical discussion of the actual necessity of the bill might help temper the appetite for its enactment. In particular, if the industry cooperates with the FDA as recommended above, manufacturing lobbyists would have compelling arguments that it is unnecessary to add additional, onerous regulations to an industry that is already highly regulated, and is already cooperating with all FDA requests for information.
Conclusion
The COVID-19 crisis has presented all aspects of society with unprecedented challenges, and the medical device industry has not been immune. In its ever-evolving response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA has identified certain areas where it is concerned that medical device manufacturers are under-regulated. Certain members of Congress have become alarmed by these concerns and have responded by introducing a Senate bill with laudable goals that would nonetheless have potentially damaging side effects on all medical device manufacturers making products deemed “essential.” Industry members would be well-advised to assuage the FDA’s alarms by voluntarily cooperating with its reporting requests, and by employing lobbying efforts as appropriate to highlight the overreaching, unnecessary consequences of the Medical Device Act.
If you have any questions, please contact our COVID-19 Task Force.
Link to article
