Member Articles
Is the COVID-19 Vaccination in a Child’s Best Interest?
Related Articles inDispute Resolution | Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
More Dispute Resolution | Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals Aricles → Latest Firm's PressShoosmiths LLP In M v H (Private Law Vaccination) [2020], the mother objected to the parties' two children aged six-years-old and four-years-old being given routine childhood vaccines in accordance with the NHS vaccination schedule. The father applied for a specific issue order requiring the children to be vaccinated and extended his application to include future travel abroad and the COVID-19 vaccination. MacDonald J granted the father's application requiring the parties' children to be given routine childhood vaccinations. Provided the COVID-19 vaccination is approved for use in children, the court is likely to consider such vaccination in a child's best interests. His judgement can be summarised as follows:
This case was heard on 10 December 2020. The judge was not prepared to make a specific order with respect to the COVID-19 vaccination and made it clear that his decision to defer reaching a conclusion regarding administration to the children of the vaccine did not signal any doubt on the part of the court regarding the probity or efficacy of that vaccine. Rather, it reflected the very early stage reached with respect to administration of the COVID-19 vaccine to children. Case: M v H (Private Law Vaccination) [2020] EWFC 93 (15 December 2020) (MacDonald J) M v H (Private Law Vaccination) [2020] EWFC 93 (15 December 2020) (bailii.org)
|
Link to article
Related Articles in
Dispute Resolution | Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
- Travel to India during COVID-19
February, 2021 - Bulletin Real Time: Latest News
February, 2021 - A One-Way Street: A Petition Arguing Obvious Did Not Give Notice of Anticipation
February, 2021 - Justices Should Weigh In On FCA Objective Falsity Standard
February, 2021
More Dispute Resolution | Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals Aricles →
Latest Firm's Press
Shoosmiths LLP