WSG Article: AMF Investigations: The duty to answer an investigator and his jurisdiction to rule on objections (continued see In Fact and In Law Express, December 2012)

AMF Investigations: The duty to answer an investigator and his jurisdiction to rule on objections (continued see In Fact and In Law Express, December 2012)

December, 2012 - Dina Raphaël

With regard to our In Fact and In Law Express newsletter of July 2012, entitled ‘‘AMF Investigations: The duty to answer an investigator and his jurisdiction to rule on objections’’, please be informed that, on December 20, 2012, the Supreme Court dismissed Fournier’s application for leave¹ to appeal a Court of Appeal decision², which convicted Fournier of an offence under section 195(4) SA because of his refusal to testify whereas lower courts acquitted him.

The Court of Appeal judgment is now final.

Footnotes:
1. - No 34979.
2. - 2012 QCCA 1179.

MEMBER COMMENTS

WSG Member: Please login to add your comment.

Disclaimer

Member Article

AMF Investigations: The duty to answer an investigator and his jurisdiction to rule on objections (continued see In Fact and In Law Express, December 2012)

MEMBER COMMENTS

Quick Links