Post a comment
Print articleAMF Investigations: The duty to answer an investigator and his jurisdiction to rule on objections (continued see In Fact and In Law Express, December 2012)
December, 2012 - Dina Raphaël
With regard to our In Fact and In Law Express newsletter of July 2012, entitled ‘‘AMF Investigations: The duty to answer an investigator and his jurisdiction to rule on objections’’, please be informed that, on December 20, 2012, the Supreme Court dismissed Fournier’s application for leave1 to appeal a Court of Appeal decision2, which convicted Fournier of an offence under section 195(4) SA because of his refusal to testify whereas lower courts acquitted him.
The Court of Appeal judgment is now final.
Footnotes: 1. - No 34979. 2. - 2012 QCCA 1179. |
